www.therealdifference.com 

Home | Issue Comparison | Issue Details | Green Party | Feedback

What is the Clinton Legacy?

NAFTA and other anti-labor anti-eco trade cabals; Plan Colombia; national health insurance discarded from the Democratic platform; Reagan's space-based missile scam revived; Reagan's welfare reform dream signed; the war on drugs escalated; small nations bombed; the Kyoto protocols obstructed (Hague conference, November 2000); prison populations doubled; etc.; etc.  Let's not forget the zeal of mainstream Democrats currently in Congress to endorse the USA Patriot Act, surrender constitutional war powers to Bush, pass the 2001 Bankruptcy Bill, retreat on prescription assistance for seniors (the Grassley-Baucus bill).  Poor and working people indeed.

What's left for the Greens to spoil?  The real spoilers of 2000 were not Nader and the Greens, but the Florida GOP and a biased US Supreme Court, armed with ballot access rules targeted at African Americans that the Democrats have still not  attempted to dismantle, and accommodated by Dems in the Senate who refused to back the Black Caucus's challenge to the engineered Bush victory.  Nader's spoilage is a useful myth that Dems at the top don't quite believe: read DLC chief Al From's "Building A New Progressive Majority: How Democrats Can Can Learn From The Failed 2000 Campaign" <http://www.ndol.org/ndol_ci.cfm?cp=1&kaid=86&subid=84&contentid=2919>.

The Democratic mainstream's retreat from poor and working people has given Republicans the license to move to even greater extremes.  The Dems will not reverse this direction.  The likely nominee for 2004 will be a Kerry or a Gephardt, who will maintain Clinton's DLC agenda, certainly not a Kucinich.  The argument against Green participation is essentially an argument to restrict the November 2004 ballot to two pro-war pro-corporate candidates.  The Green Party <http://www.gp.org> is here to stay, because the US needs an opposition party.

Scott McLarty

Scott McLarty is a member of the Green Party Media Committee.  This letter was written in response to comments made by Paul Berman in an article posted at Salon.


For more information: Green Party.